Hoops Report: Last stand

Ole Miss 84, Auburn men 74

I thought Auburn might draw a decent crowd at Beard-Eaves last night. Crazy-sounding, I know, but the Rebels came in ranked 18th in the country, for a nationally-televised (such as “nationally televised” is when it means ESPNU) pivotal game, on a Thursday night when I can’t imagine that there’s that much going on on the Plains. The Auburn-centric areas of Twitter were imploring fans to get out to the game; you may have noticed we here at TWER decided to go with a liveblog. This game felt like maybe not a big big deal, but at least a medium-sized deal, deal enough that you wouldn’t be able to hear every individual student heckle sent in Andy Kennedy’s direction.

Two minutes in I plainly heard something about Kennedy going bald, and I knew that that decent crowd had no materialized. But two minutes in, I also knew why, because Auburn’s offense to that point had consisted of a series of passes around the perimeter followed by contested Tay Waller jumpers. They’d happened to go in, but made or not jumpshots with a hand in the face don’t make for good–or, more importantly where the attendance was concerned, attractive–basketball.

It took the better part of 30 minutes, but eventually, of course, the jumpers stopped falling, Auburn’s ever-wretched defense caught up with them, and the Rebels raced out to a double-digit victory. It was inevitable.

And so, I think, are the attendance problems. As we covered in the liveblog last night: watching this team just isn’t fun. On paper, watching an athletic team that’s committed to forcing turnovers, running the fast break, and taking the first decent shot available (before the opponent’s halfcourt sets can put Auburn’s size disadvantage to use) should be exciting, right? Right. Too bad that in practice, it’s just a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing: empty gambles on defense, ill-advised perimeter shots on offense, a general feeling that this team is never in control of what it’s doing. Who wants to come to Beard-Eaves and watch a glorified pickup game? Especially when the other team’s players–be they Ole Miss’s or Sam Houston State’s–are usually better at playing that style than Auburn’s are anyways?

And so I wonder if Jeff Lebo’s departure is also inevitable. I’m not ready to go that far quite yet; it’s not crazy to think Auburn could sweep these next three (vs. ‘Bama, at Arkansas, vs. Georgia), pick up a few more home wins down the stretch, pull an upset or two at the league tourney, and squeeze their way into the NIT. It’s really not.

But at some point the program and its head coach reach what I think of as the Phil Fulmer Point of No Return. A lot of wags have chastised Mike Hamilton for punting a coach with as much success as Big Phil when he did, but the atmosphere surrounding the Vol football team had turned so poisonous and negative Hamilton didn’t really have a choice.

Auburn’s fans unfortunately don’t care enough about the hoops team–and, to be fair, generally like Lebo too much as a guy, I think–to rain down the boos and turn things nasty. But from an administrative standpoint, the all-engulfing apathy surrounding this team might be even worse; at least fans booing the coach have paid for a ticket. Auburn hasn’t reached the point yet where that apathy is so palpable that Lebo has to be forced out regardless of his results, not when the new arena might be enough to correct the damage for him …

… but last night, you could see that point approaching. Lebo has to make watching Auburn enjoyable again, now, and the only way to do that is win.

Points from the box score:

– As has been the case for Auburn throughout the season, the Tigers finally got one guy hot only to see another collapse. The former in this case was Waller, the latter Frankie Sullivan, who suffered through a miserable 2-of-12 performance. (Dewayne Reed finished 4-for-15, but that of course is standard operating procedure by now.) You could call Auburn’s inability to get everybody on the same page at the same time bad luck, but at this point it’s smarter to call it a function of the offense: when all you take are low-percentage shots that sometimes drop and sometimes don’t, you’re going to be subject to wild fluctuations like we’ve seen from Sullivan and Waller (and from Auburn as a whole from half to half).

– As we’ve been saying for weeks, though, the offense may be ugly to look at … but it isn’t the problem. Ole Miss scored 1.21 points-per-possession last night, which, so you know, is gawdawful; on the raw numbers side, Auburn allowed 80 or more points for the 5th time in 6 games. If I plug BBState and tell you (if you didn’t know) that it’s a must-subscribe for anyone with an interest in college basketball, maybe Kyle won’t mind my sharing this with you:

That’s a graph (or as hoopheads call it, an “aerial”) plotting the SEC’s teams against their points-per-possession scored and allowed in conference play. (The axes are set at 1.00.) Offense reads left to right, defense bottom to top. So as you can see, through seven games Auburn’s a little better offensively than Arkansas and even Miss. St. and Carolina (and way better offensively than LSU or ‘Bama), but are better defensively than … no one. They’re rock-bottom. It’s not even close.

Frankly, this is on Lebo: if he can’t ever turn Dewayne Reed into a good shooter or Tay Waller into a fearless driver to the basket, OK. And he is working with a marked absence of height. But this team just shouldn’t be this bad at playing defense. They just shouldn’t.

Auburn’s played a difficult schedule, to be sure. But to this point, LSU’s the only team that’s even in Auburn’s ballpark in terms of statistical failure.

Tennessee 85, Auburn women 56

If Pat Summitt’s got an ax to grind with you–and after Auburn’s twin beatdowns of the Lady Vols last year, you wouldn’t blame her if she did–you’re probably due for a hiding sooner rather than later. And so Auburn got theirs in Thompson-Boling last night. Alli Smalley scored 21 and kept Auburn in it early with a series of 3′s, but that’s about all the good that can be said about this game. That, and that it only counts for one loss in the record book, and that Auburn will have the chance to–as Fortner puts it–get right back on the horse on Sunday.

Photo by Van Emst.

7 Responses for “Hoops Report: Last stand”

  1. J.D. says:

    I wouldn’t say I’m actively pulling for Auburn to lose, but I don’t get down when we do. I also don’t get too excited when we win. I’m just ready for the Jeff Lebo era at Auburn to come to an end, and have been since about 2006-2007.

  2. Jonesy says:

    I didn’t turn on Lebo until this year, but I’m past the breaking point. This apathy doesn’t deserve the right to infect the new arena. I’ve got tickets to 3 more games, including saturday. I’ll be there and I won’t boo, but I’m forced to scream obscenities at the TV every time i see jeffy.

    just another reason to hate UNC…

  3. AubOrange says:

    I think it’s funny you compare Lebo’s tenure to Phillip Fulmer, because Phillip Fulmer was actually GOOD once upon a time. But everybody knows where I stand on Lebo and I don’t even think I need to go into it any more.

    And I don’t think Auburn fans will ever truly make it rain boo’s on the team, nomatter who’s coaching or what’s happening.

    But Armstrong looked good last night. Had some solid high-quality minutes.

    Bring on Bama.

  4. WarBlogEagle says:

    AO, I wouldn’t compare Fulmer’s UT tenure to Lebo’s at all, for the reasons you listed. My point is just that there comes a time when it doesn’t matter what the on-field/court results are–a change has to be made for the program anyway.

    Armstrong did look solid last night. Would like to see him get Lett’s minutes … it’s not like Lett’s putting them to particularly good use at the moment.

  5. AubOrange says:

    And last night wasn’t the first time we’ve seen flashes from Armstrong. (I still haven’t seen highlights or anything… I’d like to see that reverse dunk again.)

    I can’t help but imagine the squad two years from now; A grizzled veteran senior in Frankie Sullivan leads Armstrong and Chubb (maybe) and company, in a time where there’s still that new arena smell lingering, but the new coaching staff has had a year under its belt and everyone is completely transitioned and acclimated.

    Of course, a certain offseason change would have to take place for that to come true. (And for the vision of next season; a new arena, and a new coach, and a new life breathed into the squad, and the aura of excitement that would come with it.)

  6. Tommy Armour says:

    I guess we probably should have seen this coming. The losses of Quantez, Vot, and Rasheem were just too much to overcome even for a team with as much experience as this one has (note that Q and Vot in particular were good defenders/rebounders which we lack now). It sucks to watch a team with 4 seniors in the starting lineup struggle like this. Hate to say it, but it also discourages me for the 2010-2011 season no matter who the coach is.

    Jerry, totally agree with you on Lett – I’m not sure why he’s on scholarship. Dude can’t score and he’s no enforcer on defense either (but then neither is Knox but at least he can put the ball in the hole).

    I really want(ed) Jeff Lebo to succeed at Auburn and I probably won’t grumble if he sticks for one more year but I’m afraid the truth may be that it’s time to give someone else a shot with this program.

  7. Tommy Armour says:

    Here’s a stat – Jarvis Varnado has 102 blocked shots this season. Auburn has 52 as a TEAM.

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT

Sevenpixels Web Design