<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday knee-jerk: Great nonexpectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/</link>
	<description>Auburn&#039;s Daily Meta-Memoir</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can&#8217;t help myself: a first look at the 2010 offense &#124; The War Eagle Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Can&#8217;t help myself: a first look at the 2010 offense &#124; The War Eagle Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>[...] is because waiting for next year is going to prove very difficult indeed, even for expectations-dousing rationalists like your humble Auburn Blogger. Auburn will be in their second year with their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is because waiting for next year is going to prove very difficult indeed, even for expectations-dousing rationalists like your humble Auburn Blogger. Auburn will be in their second year with their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spread Sheets &#124; The War Eagle Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Spread Sheets &#124; The War Eagle Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>[...] $800,000 later:  what Jerry said. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $800,000 later:  what Jerry said. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AUfanintheEU</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>AUfanintheEU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-978</guid>
		<description>I just found your blog!  Great points in this one (let&#039;s just enjoy this team while we can), and fun blog in general!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your blog!  Great points in this one (let&#8217;s just enjoy this team while we can), and fun blog in general!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarBlogEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>WarBlogEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Driver, I mentioned it in my immediate postgame wrap. Certainly, Caudle looked a lot faster than I expected him to.

But as Todd makes more and more clear each game, you gotta be able to sling it to play QB in this offense, and as nice as the TD run was, Caudle&#039;s pick was just as bad and probably worse. We now know Auburn&#039;s zone read/option game might be a little more potent if Caudle has to come in for Todd, but I don&#039;t think he helped himself overall vs. BSU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driver, I mentioned it in my immediate postgame wrap. Certainly, Caudle looked a lot faster than I expected him to.</p>
<p>But as Todd makes more and more clear each game, you gotta be able to sling it to play QB in this offense, and as nice as the TD run was, Caudle&#8217;s pick was just as bad and probably worse. We now know Auburn&#8217;s zone read/option game might be a little more potent if Caudle has to come in for Todd, but I don&#8217;t think he helped himself overall vs. BSU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audashdriver</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>audashdriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Just looking for the shout out to Caudle&#039;s 52 yard td run, since no one is giving I&#039;ll give it. The report out of camp was that Caudle could smoke Burns in a deadheat he just didn&#039;t have as many moves, point proven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looking for the shout out to Caudle&#8217;s 52 yard td run, since no one is giving I&#8217;ll give it. The report out of camp was that Caudle could smoke Burns in a deadheat he just didn&#8217;t have as many moves, point proven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarBlogEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>WarBlogEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AU_Mech</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>AU_Mech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Here is what the NCAA rule states:

&quot;When a valid fair catch signal is made, the unimpeded opportunity to catch a free or scrimmage kick is extended to a player who muffs the kick and still has an opportunity to complete the catch. This protection terminates when the kick touches the ground. If the player subsequently catches the kick, the ball is placed where it was first touched.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what the NCAA rule states:</p>
<p>&#8220;When a valid fair catch signal is made, the unimpeded opportunity to catch a free or scrimmage kick is extended to a player who muffs the kick and still has an opportunity to complete the catch. This protection terminates when the kick touches the ground. If the player subsequently catches the kick, the ball is placed where it was first touched.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarBlogEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>WarBlogEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-813</guid>
		<description>Huh. It&#039;s possible the rule is different in college than the pros (I don&#039;t watch a lot of NFL these days and am not familiar with it), but if it comes up again (and with our punt returning crew, it just might) that&#039;ll definitely be worth looking up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. It&#8217;s possible the rule is different in college than the pros (I don&#8217;t watch a lot of NFL these days and am not familiar with it), but if it comes up again (and with our punt returning crew, it just might) that&#8217;ll definitely be worth looking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AU_Mech</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>AU_Mech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-811</guid>
		<description>If we are to speak of blown calls then we can&#039;t forget about the blown &quot;Kick Catch Interference&quot; that wasn&#039;t called on BSU that lead to their first score.  By rule a player that calls a fair catch (Gulley) has the right to catch that ball all the way until it hits the ground.  So he can bobble it as many times as he wants as long as it doesn&#039;t hit the ground.  It was called in the Titans-Houston game two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are to speak of blown calls then we can&#8217;t forget about the blown &#8220;Kick Catch Interference&#8221; that wasn&#8217;t called on BSU that lead to their first score.  By rule a player that calls a fair catch (Gulley) has the right to catch that ball all the way until it hits the ground.  So he can bobble it as many times as he wants as long as it doesn&#8217;t hit the ground.  It was called in the Titans-Houston game two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarBlogEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2009/09/sunday-knee-jerk-great-nonexpectations/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>WarBlogEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewareaglereader.com/?p=2908#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Alan, I missed completely that there was an offsides on the safety, as did the announcers. I&#039;ll look at it again. If so, it would explain why Parrish got as hot as he did.

I should have mentioned somewhere up there that I thought Ball St. played what I&#039;m guessing was a pretty good game for them. Their defensive line was especially impressive and the o-line better than I&#039;d been led to believe--they had something to do with our d-line not doing a whole lot.

I also kind of wondered about a few of those late bombs, Alan, particularly the one over the middle to Fannin in the fourth quarter. I would have rather not seen that, to be honest, but the team is still in the first year of the offense and needs all the reps it can get as we head into SEC play ... at least, that&#039;s what I&#039;m telling myself.

Glad you enjoyed your trip to Auburn, though of course I&#039;m not surprised in the least to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I missed completely that there was an offsides on the safety, as did the announcers. I&#8217;ll look at it again. If so, it would explain why Parrish got as hot as he did.</p>
<p>I should have mentioned somewhere up there that I thought Ball St. played what I&#8217;m guessing was a pretty good game for them. Their defensive line was especially impressive and the o-line better than I&#8217;d been led to believe&#8211;they had something to do with our d-line not doing a whole lot.</p>
<p>I also kind of wondered about a few of those late bombs, Alan, particularly the one over the middle to Fannin in the fourth quarter. I would have rather not seen that, to be honest, but the team is still in the first year of the offense and needs all the reps it can get as we head into SEC play &#8230; at least, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m telling myself.</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed your trip to Auburn, though of course I&#8217;m not surprised in the least to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

